Tuesday, April 15, 2008

In a recent Animals issue of READ, we asked you what you thought about the play, Babylon's Ark. Here are a few 9th graders' responses from Bourgade Catholic High School in Phoenix, Ariz.

The Babylon's Ark story was harsh. What they did to the animals was mean and not healthy. The people trying to help them were very kind and respectful but the owner of the zoo didn't care.
     Animals should just be treated as humans. Be kind to them because they have a life too. They live on earth not just to be treated as a pet that you can kick around. They are here to bring life to us and joy, and they are friends.
     -- Jennifer Guzman

The animals are sick, hungry, and dehydrated. The Iraqis took over the zoo and they are making it a base. This was all caused by war. Now with the Iraqis out of the zoo there are people from the U.S. that are trying to help out the animals. They are having a tough time because most of the animals are really sick.
     I think that it is a great thing that people are helping out the animals at the zoo. Now with the troops helping them out there will be no more Iraqis able to enter the zoo and kill the remaining animals. I still think it is dangerous for the people at the zoo. They hear a lot of guns and one of those bullets can hit you and you can die.
     If it was my zoo I would have bulletproof walls and it would be blocked off so no Iraqis can come in and use it for a base. I would also put bombs where there are no animals because that is were the Iraqis would hide and it will blow them up.
     -- Blake Comella

If it was my zoo I would never abandon my animals. I would always care to them and make sure they are getting the same requirements as other zoos or better. So if someone tried to take over my zoo and turn it into a base. I would do everything in my power to stop them and make sure all the animals are safe.
     -- Vince Fielder

I would set a zoo up by, first hiring people that love animals and are not scared of them. Second, they have to be cheap And third, they have to know what there doing... if not, get out of here. I would set up some crazy electric fence so no animals can get out and no one can get in and steal any either. 
     -- Kristopher Verdugo

If I had a zoo I would separate the animals into groups and give the animals a theme I would pick the theme depending on the animal. I would keep the birds in one big cage so they can fly around. I would also have timers for the food so every three hours the food will fall on the floor.
     I would put the fish in a clear tank and make it look like the ocean, and I would also clean the tank every three days.
     I would clean the zoo every Sunday and clean the cages every day. I am going to give the animals a good meal and feed them lunch and dinner.
     I would hire trainers to train the animals so they can not attack the people. I would throw toys in the cages for the animals so they can play with them. I would give the animals a bath and dry them. I would also hire veterinarians to check the animals health, and make sure they have all there shots.
     -- A.J. Magdaleno


# (2)#
StudentWriter    Posted by
StudentWriter
on 4/15/2008
1:49 PM
 Monday, April 14, 2008

I started reading The Horse and the Boy this weekend. It is one of the seven books in The Chronicles of Narnia by C.S. Lewis. In the anthology I am reading, the order of the books is as follows: 1) The Magician's Nephew, 2) The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, 3) The Horse and His Boy, 4) Prince Caspian, 5) The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, 6) The Silver Chair, 7) The Last Battle. A little amazon.com research just told me that the publishers of this anthology put them in this order because it is chronological.

One Canadian reviewer named "Godly Gadfly" says on amazon.com: "The chronological order makes the books more strictly allegorical than they really were intended to be..."

Another reviewer, C.N. White from Raleigh, N.C. says: "...reading these books in chronological order spoils all of the surprise and magic out of the first visit to Narnia (in The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe), because we already know what's going on. ... Things don't always need to be put in chronological order. If you're going to read them, please read them in the correct order: 1) The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, 2) Prince Caspian, 3) The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, 4) The Silver Chair, 5) The Horse and His Boy, 6) The Magician's Nephew, and 7) The Last Battle"

I was wondering why Hollywood skipped The Magican's Nephew and started with The Lion, the Witch, and The Wardrobe! Now it makes sense! They were being smart! What a concept!

I wish I had known about this before I started reading these books. It's too late for me. If you have any intention of picking up the Narnia Anthology (and you should, it's great!), please heed the advice of these intelligent readers.

It's really a shame that the publisher chose to put the bookss in the wrong order in the anthology. Chronology isn't always the best way to do things.

Sidenote: I told my 2 year old nephew that I was reading a book where there are talking horses. He refused to believe me. "No!" he said. I assured him that it was true and he just shook his head and walked away.

Coming to WORD tomorrow: One class' reaction to Babylon's Ark, a Center Stage play in READ. Stay tuned...


# #
Bryon    Posted by
Bryon
on 4/14/2008
9:16 AM
 Tuesday, April 08, 2008
It's that time again--the Pulitzer Prizes have been announced! I, for one, look forward to when the awards for exemplary works of journalism, books, drama, and music are released each year. It's exciting to discover new things to read. I spent at least an hour today reading the New York Times reporter Amy Harmon's winning series about DNA testing and its ethical issues. She really demonstrated how to write an understandable and interesting set of articles about very difficult issues.

Well, I might as well admit that the photography category is my favorite. Great photographs do what words can't. I love the way an amazing photo can tell a story, riveting the viewer to its subject. Preston Gannaway of New Hampshire's Concord Monitor won a Pulitzer for her photos about a family's struggle with a mother's fatal illness. Let me tell you, it's a tearjerker.

The Pulitzer Prize web site offers plenty to read and see. Of course it can't post a play on its site, but I hope to one day see winner August: Osage County one day. My fellow blogger, Audra gave it ten thumbs up (for the record, Audra only has the normal two thumbs, but she really, really liked the play).

There's so many categories and so many winners that I'll have to ask you to check it out yourself:www.pulitzer.org. Enjoy! I'm  going to check out the Investigative Journalism category myself right now.

# (1)#
Alicia    Posted by
Alicia
on 4/8/2008
3:31 PM
 Wednesday, April 02, 2008

"Slang ... an attempt of common humanity to escape from bald literalism, and express itself illimitably ... the wholesome fermentation or eructation of those processes eternally active in language, by which froth and specks are thrown up, mostly to pass away, though occasionally to settle and permanently crystallize" –Walt Whitman, 1885 

My younger sister and I sat at our family dinner table on Easter Sunday, salivating over the aroma of my mother’s stuffed leg of lamb. Our father made his way from the bedroom to the table to join our pre-dinner chatter.

"BT Dubbs,"1 said my sister, "your celly2 was blowin' up3 like woah4 while you were at yoga in the am."5

"For realsies?"
6 I asked.  I hadn’t checked my cell phone since that morning. "Did you answer?"  

"After the third call, yeah. It was Jay. He sweats you7 hardcore."8

 
"Whatevs.9 I’ll call him later."

It was at this moment of polite conversation that our father abruptly slammed his fist on the table. "Speak English!" he cried.

"Oh Em Gee!"10 replied my sister, "Freak out why don't you, Dad?"

My father, attempting to curb his temper, lowered his voice and said, "I'm sick of this. I can't understand a single word you girls say to each other anymore. You sound uneducated. My daughter the writer sounds like she can't speak the language." He was referring to me. 

Of course, I can speak the language. In fact, I can speak it so well that I choose to finesse and manipulate it into a shorthand language, that is, slang. Merriam-Webster defines slang as:
"an informal nonstandard vocabulary composed typically of coinages, arbitrarily changed words, and extravagant, forced, or facetious figures of speech."
I pretty firmly believe that slang is not spoken for a lack of language comprehension. Rather, it demonstrates a hyper-awareness of the language, and an understanding of the culture surrounding it.

 When my sister says "BT Dubbs," it is her slang for "by the way." But by using her slang version, she refers to much more than the literal expression "by the way." By saying the letters "BT" she is referring to the common typing or texting shorthand, where that phrase is abbreviated to "BTW." However, my sister is so culturally enlightened that she goes one better, and changes the "W" in "BTW" to "Dubbs," as in "Dubbya," a nickname for the middle initial of our president, George "Dubbya" Bush. So what she has done in that one quick phrase "BT Dubbs" is made her explicit point clear (the literal "by the way"), and clued me in to the fact that she is savvy about online or text speak, and is aware of our current political climate.  That's how slang works. It makes a word or phrase do more than just a job of literal communication. It personalizes your language.

 Furthermore, the "informal" aspect of slang is what makes it inappropriate in so many contexts, such as on tests or when speaking with strangers. So, by using slang, you are assuming a comfort level with the person with whom you speak.  To speak slang to someone is to assume that they, too, understand the cultural currency and outside references of your unorthodox vocabulary. Slang speak then becomes a club, either you are in and understand the code, or you aren't.

Those who aren't in on the slang, usually view it as illegitimate or uneducated. James C. Fernal once referred to slang as the "advertisement of mental poverty." This is because they are missing part of the message. All they hear is the destruction of the literal phrase, but they cannot perceive the additional codes. So of course, it does sound like nonsense.  Or it sends a different message entirely.

A great mystery was solved in my family once my father got the ball rolling about our uneducated English. For months, my mother had been shouting very loudly when leaving voicemail messages on my sister's cell phone. "CAN. YOU. PICK. UP. SOME. MILK!! LOVE. YOU!" It was at this Easter dinner where we discovered the reason. My sister’s voicemail message requests that the caller leave their message in the form of a "shout out." Our hapless but well-meaning mother assumed there must be a problem with her voicemail that made it difficult to hear.

But what does all of this add up to? Our dad was still annoyed that he couldn't understand us, and no amount of explaining would undo that. Yet, my sister and I still relished our slang speak. It does appear to be a matter of time and place. Because of its informal nature, slang simply doesn't work in every context (So please don't add "OMG" to your history papers). Apparently one such inappropriate context is my family dinner table. Most slang comes and goes with the times, but some of it eventually makes a permanent place in mainstream language. After all, "hot" didn't always mean "cool," and "cool" didn’t always mean "good." These are slang terms that we've grown to accept. This is how language develops and changes. Eventually, everyone catches on. 

Our mother made her way over to the table with the succulent dish of lamb. She looked laughingly at our father,  "Lighten up, Sam. Srsly."


Our Slang, Decoded
1. See translation in text.
2. cell phone
3.<!--[endif]--> ringing
4. a lot
5. this morning
6.<!--[endif]--> Oh, really?
7. likes, has a crush
8.<!--[endif]--> a lot
9. whatever
10. This is the verbal pronunciation of “OMG,” which is online shorthand for “Oh my God,” but usually just refers to general shock.


# (2)#
Audra    Posted by
Audra
on 4/2/2008
3:05 PM


Read and Writing Blog Writing Magazine Read Magazine Books and Authors Get Published Writing Tips 1000 Words Musings and Ramblings Cool Links Fiction Student Writing Nonfiction Student Writing Poetry Student Writing Submit Your Student Writing